In case the title of this blog left you with a quizzical look, no, the title is correct. Those of you that work across intellectual property rights (e.g. in both patents and trademarks) will be familiar with the payment of patent annuities.
However, there's a select group of jurisdictions where annual fees are payable to maintain trademark registrations.
Annual fees make the Cayman Islands one of the most expensive jurisdictions in which to maintain trademark registrations (although recent hikes in the official fees in the UAE and Venezuela means it's not the only place where maintaining a trademark registration can cost a fortune).
The Cayman Islands Registry used to allow representatives from anywhere to attend to matters before them. This changed in 2012 so that a local representative was required. I've previously worked with the local Registry but this change prevented me from doing so directly and therefore being able to maintain trademarks most cost-effectively for clients. Local agents in the Cayman Islands tend to be expensive reflecting the high cost of living there. It is worth considering paying all the annual fees (up to a registration's renewal date) in bulk to reduce the level of professional fees.
It's also worth being 'tactical' and avoiding registering trademarks in December. Annual fees fall due on 1 January each year so if you register in December you'll find yourself with an immediate payment to be made to keep the registration you have only just got in force.
The Cayman Islands are now looking to introduce a fresh trademark law (that removes its dependency on UK or Community registrations). It will be interesting to see how they set their official fees. Annual fees may be abolished but they will need to bring in examiners to handle applications filed under a new substantive trademark law so an increase in initial filing fees and, possibly, renewal fees could be anticipated.
Like the Cayman Islands, the Turks and Caicos Islands are a British Overseas Territory. They also share a need for annual fees to be paid to maintain trademark registrations. With a population roughly half that of the Cayman Islands and an economy that is not as developed, the number of trademarks registered in the Turks and Caicos Islands is a lot less.
Remaining firmly in the Western Hemisphere, Honduras is another country where annual fees are due. Again, I think it's worthwhile considering paying them in bulk up to a registration's renewal date as it can make the management of the registration easier.
Don't confuse these annual fees for Honduras with rehabilitation taxes. These taxes, which are unique to Honduras, are an optional payment. When paid they will protect a registration from being cancelled for non-use. Therefore, you only need to pay them if you're not using a trademark.
Rehabilitation taxes can easily be forgotten about and this is understandable when they are optional and not a mandatory maintenance requirement. They can be paid retrospectively. Therefore, if you have a registration that is vulnerable to cancellation on the grounds of non-use but you wish to file an opposition based on this registration, you would just need to back-pay any rehabilitation taxes prior to filing an opposition to help avoid a counter cancellation action on the grounds of non-use.
So annual maintenance payments to maintain trademark registrations may not be common, but if you help manage trademark renewals or maintenance then be aware that they can crop up from time-to-time. Even if you don't have patents under your responsibilities, you may also come across annual fees/annuities when maintaining design registrations (particularly in countries where the design law is a subset of the patent law) or domain names.
Showing posts with label design patent. Show all posts
Showing posts with label design patent. Show all posts
10 June 2015
11 June 2013
On-line Design applications
Following last week's announcement from WIPO on their improved on-line filing facility for Hague International Design applications, this week I will look at the on-line filing abilities of some other Offices.
OHIM provides a platform for filing Registered Community Design applications on-line. This is well used and the ease of uploading representations makes the applications significantly easier.
Compare this to the United Kingdom where paper forms are still required and it can be a bit fiddly collating all the representations into order. The same is the case in Germany, Benelux and Portugal, as examples.
OHIM's Cooperation Fund should help all countries within the EU introduce on-line facilities for filing design applications in the future. Among its initiatives, many national trade mark applications in EU member states can be filed on-line. These are scheduled to be extended to design applications in due course.
Outside the European Union, Switzerland has not yet developed an on-line process although it does accept applications via e-mail. However, Switzerland can be included within a Hague application.
Further afield, Canada and Australia offer on-line tools for which they should be commended.
It is understandable that systems for on-line design applications need to be robust in order to cope with a large number of representations as attachments. This makes them less easy to implement.
In the UK at least, most national designs are filed by local, often individual, designers directly (bigger firms and those professionally represented tend to take the European or International route). Their voice is perhaps less heard than professional IP organisations. This factor may also contribute towards why the UK IPO may not have considered it a priority to implement an on-line filing system for designs. As the UK looks to revamp its design legislation, the practical improvement of developing an on-line tool may also be carried out ahead of any support from OHIM's Cooperation Fund..
OHIM provides a platform for filing Registered Community Design applications on-line. This is well used and the ease of uploading representations makes the applications significantly easier.
Compare this to the United Kingdom where paper forms are still required and it can be a bit fiddly collating all the representations into order. The same is the case in Germany, Benelux and Portugal, as examples.
OHIM's Cooperation Fund should help all countries within the EU introduce on-line facilities for filing design applications in the future. Among its initiatives, many national trade mark applications in EU member states can be filed on-line. These are scheduled to be extended to design applications in due course.
Outside the European Union, Switzerland has not yet developed an on-line process although it does accept applications via e-mail. However, Switzerland can be included within a Hague application.
Further afield, Canada and Australia offer on-line tools for which they should be commended.
It is understandable that systems for on-line design applications need to be robust in order to cope with a large number of representations as attachments. This makes them less easy to implement.
In the UK at least, most national designs are filed by local, often individual, designers directly (bigger firms and those professionally represented tend to take the European or International route). Their voice is perhaps less heard than professional IP organisations. This factor may also contribute towards why the UK IPO may not have considered it a priority to implement an on-line filing system for designs. As the UK looks to revamp its design legislation, the practical improvement of developing an on-line tool may also be carried out ahead of any support from OHIM's Cooperation Fund..
Labels:
applications,
Australia,
Canada,
Design,
design patent,
Europe,
European Union,
Hague,
on-line filing,
RCD,
UK,
USA
27 November 2012
Caribbean IP Part 19: Puerto Rico
ISO 3166 country code: PR.
Puerto Rico is an unincorporated territory of the United States. As such it cannot accede to international agreements being a non-sovereign nation.
The Department of State administers trade marks, commercial names and US deposits. The latter refers to the deposit of a US Federal Registration with the local Office, similar to the UK registration extension provision in a few Commonwealth countries.
Filings for these rights can be made on-line. It is also possible to make on-line trade mark searches although they state that the database is not yet complete and therefore you should corroborate any findings with the physical Trade Marks Register. It is also necessary to search trade marks, commercial names and US deposits through separate databases.
If you have clicked on the links, you will see that they are in Spanish only. Spanish is the language of an estimated 95% of the population, although English also has official status.
I understand that Puerto Rico does not have design legislation of its own and would be covered automatically by a US design patent granted federally by the USPTO.
Puerto Ricans, despite being US citizens, did not have the right to vote in the Federal election of 6 November 2012. However, on the same day, they voted with regard to their territory's status. They voted in favour of statehood, although like in the US, the island is very divided politcally. If statehood happens then it would see it covered by US Federal registrations (including Madrid Protocol designations) and relegate its Trade Marks Office to the same level as the State trade mark systems of Alabama, Alaska, etc. Statehood would have to be accepted by both the US House and Senate - and it's anticipated it could have a rough journey - so do not expect to need to treat Puerto Rico as a separate trade mark jurisdiction for some time yet.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)

