The answer in short: a translation is what something means in another language, while a transliteration is how something sounds. I find the easiest way to explain is to translate and transliterate into English.
Take the word shown here: Коледа
This is Bulgarian Cyrillic (the EU's third alphabet). The word translates to (has the meaning) "Christmas", and it transliterates to (or is written) "Koleda".
While my Bulgarian pronunciation is far from perfect, if I muttered it on the streets of Sofia or Varna, I hope that I would be understood (particularly if I were there in December).
In the field of trade marks, however, translations are not always possible. For example, the compound word STARBUCKS doesn't mean anything. Meanwhile, those of you with foreign language skills will know that transliteration can be a complicated business. If, in a stuffy Munich conference room, you uttered the phrase, "Ich bin heiss", which taken word-by-word would mean "I am hot", this would be met by raucous laughter or awkward gasps of astonishment by your German peers. I'll omit explanation of the German meaning of the phrase here (the introduction of the .xxx sponsored top-level domain may provide ITMA Review with enough adult comment to comment on), but no doubt many of you will understand the potential for confusion and embarrassment.
Getting back to Mr Tarrant, a translatable trade mark I worked on many years ago was for the Millionaire show. Its translation into Spanish was cruel on this native English speaker, who was left more tongue tied than before: ¿Quién quiere ser millonario?
And other factors influenced the brand. In Hungary, a million Forints is less than £3,000 so being a millionaire in Budapest was probably within reach for the majority. If I recall, the first Russian name of the show translated back as the fairly non-PC, "Lucky Man".
So it is clear that cultural differences and sensitivities become more prominent when dealing with translation and transliterations. (There can be difficulty with the product too. In the Russian version, "asking the audience" was not always a benefit. It is reported that audience members often deliberately gave a wrong answer. But I digress.)
The tyre company Continental apparently found the going tough when it entered the Taiwanese market. While the term "the Continent" for Brits means the whole of Europe from the other side of the English Channel onwards, "continental" in Mandarin can refer to Mainland China, which could evoke less-than-positive feelings in would-be customers in Taiwan.
No rules
We all have our horror stories and tales of success in the registration of translations and transliterations. It's important to realise there are no set rules that govern them. Translations often throw up dilemmas - how many words do the Sami people have for snow? (It’s a myth that the Inuit have many.) Meanwhile, transliterations can create different quandaries.
Cyrillic and Greek have clear letters and established equivalents in the Latin alphabet. The same can be said of the elegant-looking alphabets of Armenia and Georgia. But be careful. Think of "s" and "z" being almost identical in English, whereas the difference could be more marked in your transliteration language. Does the brand need the power of a harsh letter, or is a softer pronunciation going to serve the brand's message better?
Take particular care with Cyrillic. This issue is notable in Ukraine, since the Ukrainian and Russian languages use slightly different Cyrillic alphabets. With the exception of the autonomous Crimea, Russian is not an official language of Ukraine. However, nearly a third of the Ukrainian population speak Russian as their mother tongue, so it can be important to register both Ukrainian Cyrillic and Russian Cyrillic trade marks if they are indeed different and if the budget allows.
Be clear, also, in how your mark should be said in the first place. The sports brand Nike often rhymes with bike in British English, whereas Mikey wears Nike in the US. I am sure the American version would generally prevail, but would the British version be better suited in countries with closer links to the UK, for example, as Hindi or Urdu equivalents for India and Pakistan?
Chinese represents a difficult language group and Chinese branding consultants find themselves in a lucrative business. The complexity of the Chinese language means transliterations are translatable back into English. Let's take COCA-COLA. The transliteration adopted would be pronounced along the lines of "ke kou ke le". This can be translated into English as "tasty and enjoyable".
Display difficulties
Displaying your translated/transliterated trade mark can present additional challenges. You may wish to maintain consistent branding across the world, so ensuring your trade mark in various scripts is proportionate will be an important task for a design team, especially when a translated or transliterated mark is longer or shorter than the Latin trade mark.
In Iraq, trade mark applications for Latin script marks must be accompanied by an Arabic transliteration. You can take this as a benefit: you get your regular trade mark and an Arabic transliteration for the price of one. Iraqi agents are accustomed at devising the Arabic equivalent, which must be bigger, and sticking it on the application papers. However, be proactive if you can and see if there is already an Arabic version devised, because what the agent comes up with might not be the same.
Iraq is the only country in which transliterations are currently compulsory. And, with its own sub-classification system and 15-year registration terms, it is one of the quirkier trade mark jurisdictions around. If you come across some older Registration Certificates from Qatar, you may notice that transliterations were mandatory there too, although this situation has now changed.
In the People's Republic of China, the applicant's name must be transliterated in Chinese on the trade mark application, so be careful when filing for house marks and ensure there's consistency between them. Russia has strict advertising laws regarding elements appearing that are not in Cyrillic, which can place greater onus on Cyrillic equivalents. Take particular care with slogans and names that are likely to appear on shop signs and seek local advice.
It's clear that you or your client should contact local partners or a branding agency to ensure they get the right translations/transliterations. Can you register defensively in the meantime? For Chinese, in particular, this is difficult because of the diverse nature of the languages. Those with specific alphabets (Cyrillic, Greek, Armenian, Georgian) are easier. However, in many of these countries Latin marks will be cited against local scripts and vice-versa (although I'd make sure there was a watch in place in case an Examiner has an off-day).
To close, a final word on the use of the Madrid Protocol. It's most relevant for the filings of Cyrillic translations/transliterations in the former Soviet republics, as Madrid is far more cost-effective than national applications. However, you would need to file a base application at the UK IPO. Many companies in western Europe take this route and file at their national IPO, so the risks could be considered negligible, but would the Cyrillic mark be treated as a stylised mark by the IPO? If so, the Madrid Protocol registration should be regarded as stylised.
Furthermore, unless you are exporting direct packaged goods from the UK, there is potential that no use of the Cyrillic mark will be made, and it will be vulnerable to cancellation. To be fair, provided the Madrid filing follows hot on the heels of the UK filing, you will get through the five-year "central attack" period. However, would there have been a bona fide intention to use the mark in the UK in the first place?
These concerns are removed when you base your mark on a CTM as Cyrillic is an official alphabet. Clearly it will also have some worth if your Cyrillic translation/transliteration will be used in Bulgaria or other parts of the EC.
Sadly, there is no easy-to-follow strategy when it comes to this subject, but I hope this piece will have least lit the way, and will have left you a little less lost in translation (or transliteration).
This article originally appeared in Issue 392 March/April 2012 of ITMA Review, the journal of the Institute of Trade Mark Attorneys.
